My Blog


Not a mistake: The Supreme Court denies requests to reconsider its Article 370 ruling.

CJI Chandrachud stated that the Governor (President in J&K’s case) housesprotection can anticipate “all or any” roles of the country TeamNationalWorks legislature and such movement should be tested judicially only in first-rate cases.

The Supreme Court has disregarded petitions looking for assessment of its December 2023 judgment upholding the authorities’s August 2019 choice to cease the special repute of the then State of Jammu and Kashmir via MeteredEarn abrogating Article 370 of the Constitution.

“Having perused the evaluation petitions, there may be no errors apparent at the face fixhomecomfort of the record. No case for evaluation beneath Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Supreme Court Rules 2013. The evaluate petitions are, consequently, homesfact dismissed,” a 5-choose bench, presided by means of Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud, stated.

The bench additionally comprised sugarlanedesign Justices Sanjiv Khanna, B R Gavai, Surya Kant and A S Bopanna.

The petitions have been dismissed on May 1 and the replica of the order changed into uploaded Tuesday on the courtroom’s legitimate website.

In its landmark December 11, 2023 ruling, a Constitution Bench had unanimously brandileath positioned its stamp of approval at the Modi authorities’s August 2019 choice to end J&K’s special status by abrogating Article 370.

The then 5-judge bench comprised CJI Chandrachud and Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Sanjiv Khanna, B R Gavai and Surya Kant.

Justice Kaul retired on December motsvet 25, 2023 following which a reconstituted bench that blanketed Justice Bopanna determined the evaluation petitions.

Last December, the bench, in three houserenovant separate but concurring judgments, ordered recuperation of statehood “at the earliest”, set a September 30, 2024 deadline for holding Assembly elections inside the Union Territory of J&K and also upheld the validity of cigarcityrealtor the Centre’s selection to carve out the Union Territory of Ladakh from the erstwhile country.

The bench upheld the Constitutional firstchoicefm validity of Presidential Orders – The Constitution (Application To Jammu and Kashmir) Order (CO) 272 and 273 dated August 5 and six, 2019 – by way of which the complete Constitution of India become made relevant to J&K, putting forward all provisions of Article 370 inoperative.

It held that puredelightcandles the princely kingdom of J&K “did not maintain an detail of sovereignty whilst” it joined the Union of India.

On the reorganisation of the kingdom into the mallorcavipcare Union Territories of J&K and Ladakh in 2019, the bench rejected the argument that the Bill for this underneath Article three might have been introduced most effective with the consent of the nation legislature, saying it had, in a previous case, held that such recommendation of fielddaychallenge the kingdom legislature is only recommendatory and now not binding on Parliament.

Categorized as Blog

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *